For the last couple of years I have become particularly
interested in Dragonflies. Who wouldn't be?!
They are brightly coloured, fast flying,
hyper-aggressive aerial predators - what's not to like?
Male Common Darter (Sympetrum striolatum). |
As a result of this relatively recent fascination they took up a disproportionate chunk of my summer nature watching trips, and a correspondingly large proportion of my summer photographs. This year I didn't have as many opportunities as I would have liked because of work commitments, but I still managed the occasional sneaky trip out. My favourite spots didn't seem to have quite the numbers I remember from the last couple of years. Although this may be down to the conditions on the days I was able to visit not being ideal, end of summer weather summaries do suggest that we've had a cooler and wetter summer than average, but only by a bit.
Male Southern Hawker (Aeshna cyanea) in flight. |
Male and female Common Darter (Sympetrum striolatum) |
Male Four-Spotted Chaser (Libellula quadrimaculata) |
Female Common Darter (Sympetrum striolatum) foreground; Female Brown Hawker (Aeshna grandis) background. |
Males Azure damselfly (Coenagrion puella) |
Immature Male Black Darter (Sympetrum danae) - this one with an missing forewing, don't think he's going anywhere. |
Male & Female Large Red Damselfy (Pyrrhosoma nymphula) |
Female Emerald Damselfly (Lestes sponsa) |
Richard
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
WARNING: Real science coming up
NB: A while back I read an interesting paper about monitoring wetland habitats for Odonata and writing this made me think about it and revisit it.
Essentially, Raebel et al. (2010) were arguing that by focusing survey efforts on adult Odonata a false picture of habitat suitability or quality was being generated. They stated that even when females are observed and recorded ovipositing there is no guarantee that those eggs will hatch and develop and ultimately be successful. As dragonflies can disperse over large distances as I mentioned above, those adults present could have come from far afield, with none actually having originated in the site being surveyed. They further argued that even by conducting larval stage surveys the true picture isn't revealed because nymphs will be present in habitats were they cannot or will not make it to maturity. The only way to get a true impression of habitat suitability, they claimed, was to survey for exuviae (the 'empty casing' left over after a nymph has emerged) as this was the only way to be sure that a species had completed its breeding cycle in that location.
It made for interesting reading but wasn't without its critics, Bried, D'Amico & Samways (2012) countered that while adult only surveys may result in a positive bias indicating a higher number of species had successfully bred, exuviae only surveys had the opposite results, a negative bias under-representing the reality of successfully breeding species. This is large part is due to the time sensitive nature of exuviae, with a very narrow time window to find them, and the effort to find them being both more disruptive and far more time consuming.
Essentially, Raebel et al. (2010) were arguing that by focusing survey efforts on adult Odonata a false picture of habitat suitability or quality was being generated. They stated that even when females are observed and recorded ovipositing there is no guarantee that those eggs will hatch and develop and ultimately be successful. As dragonflies can disperse over large distances as I mentioned above, those adults present could have come from far afield, with none actually having originated in the site being surveyed. They further argued that even by conducting larval stage surveys the true picture isn't revealed because nymphs will be present in habitats were they cannot or will not make it to maturity. The only way to get a true impression of habitat suitability, they claimed, was to survey for exuviae (the 'empty casing' left over after a nymph has emerged) as this was the only way to be sure that a species had completed its breeding cycle in that location.
Very recently emerged Four-spotted Chaser (Libellula quadrimaculata) perched on its exuviae. |
Again, very interesting reading, if you want to read up on either of these papers the references are below and both can be found on Google Scholar without having to pay.
Papers referred to:
Bried, J. T., D’Amico, F. & Samways, M. J. (2012) A critique of the dragonfly delusion hypothesis: why sampling exuviae does not avoid bias, Insect Conservation and Diversity, 5: 398–402.
Raebel, E. M., Merckx, T., Riordan, P., Macdonald, D. W. & Thompson, D. J. (2010) The dragonfly delusion: why it is essential to sample exuviae to avoid biased surveys, Journal of Insect Conservation, 14: 523–533.
Raebel, E. M., Merckx, T., Riordan, P., Macdonald, D. W. & Thompson, D. J. (2010) The dragonfly delusion: why it is essential to sample exuviae to avoid biased surveys, Journal of Insect Conservation, 14: 523–533.
No comments:
Post a Comment